OECD (nd)

OECD (nd). Assessment rubric critical thinking - https://www.oecd.org/education/class-friendly-assessment-rubric-critical-thinking.pdf

Process:
 * Level 1 (dormant): The student work: "shows little willingness to explore other positions or theories than the most commonly accepted one and; shows no willingness to question the assumptions of the chosen position, theory or practices."
 * Level 2 (emergent): The student work: "shows the willingness to go beyond one’s initial way to formulate and answer the problem, but does not clearly identify the assumptions of the examined theories or practices or their strengths and weaknesses."
 * Level 3 (flourishing): The student work: "considers one other way to formulate and answer the problem; challenges one common position or idea about the problem; shows a clear understanding of the strength and limitations of the chosen and the alternative positions."
 * Level 4 (outstanding): The student work: "considers several ways of formulating and answering a problem; challenges several common positions or ideas about the problem; shows a clear understanding of the strength and limitations of the chosen and alternative positions; shows an openness to the ideas, critiques or feedback of others when relevant."

Product:
 * Level 1 (dormant): The student work: "presents a commonly accepted position to a problem; • justifies it with sound evidence, but fails to question its assumptions or consider other possible perspectives on the problem."
 * Level 2 (emergent): The student work: "presents a position to a problem that is not clearly formulated; relates this position to one alternative theory or perspective within the discipline; provides little evidence or acknowledge only minimally the assumptions and limitations of the chosen position."
 * Level 3 (flourishing): The student work: "presents a personal position to a clearly formulated problem; relates this position to one alternative theory or perspective within or outside the discipline; justifies the position with some evidence, and acknowledges the assumptions of the chosen position."
 * Level 4 (outstanding): The student work: "presents a specific personal position to a clearly formulated problem; relates this position to alternative theories or perspectives within or outside the discipline; justifies the position with good evidence; acknowledges the assumptions and limitations of the chosen position."